European Convention on the Recognition
of the Legal Personality
of International
Non-Governmental Organisations
signed at Strasbourg
on 24 April 1986 
Preamble
The member States of the Council of Europe, signatories hereto,
Considering that the aim of the Council of Europe is to achieve a greater
unity between its members, in particular for the purpose of safeguarding
and realising ideals and principles which are their common heritage;
Recognising that international non-governmental organisations carry out
work of value to the international community, particularly in the scientific,
cultural, charitable, philanthropic, health and education fields, and
that they contribute to the achievement of the aims and principles of
the United Nations Charter and the Statute of the Council of Europe;
Desiring to establish in their mutual relations rules laying down the
conditions for recognition of the legal personality of these organisations
in order to facilitate their activities at European level;
Have agreed as follows:
Article 1 
This Convention shall apply to associations, foundations and other private
institutions (hereinafter referred to as “NGOs”) which satisfy
the following conditions:
a. have a non-profit-making aim of international
utility;
b. have been established by an instrument governed
by the internal law of a Party;
c. carry on their activities with effect in
at least two States; and
d. have their statutory office in the territory
of a Party and the central management and control in the territory of
that Party or of another Party.
Article 2 
- 1. The legal personality and capacity, as
acquired by an NGO in the Party in which it has its statutory office,
shall be recognised as of right in the other Parties.
- 2. When they are required by essential public
interest, restrictions, limitations or special procedures governing the
exercise of the rights arising out of the legal capacity and provided
for by the legislation of the Party where recognition takes place, shall
be applicable to NGOs established in another Party.
Article 3 
- 1. The proof of acquisition of legal personality
and capacity shall be furnished by presenting the NGO's memorandum and
articles of association or other basic constitutional instruments. Such
instruments shall be accompanied by documents establishing administrative
authorisation, registration or any other form of publicity in the Party
which granted the legal personality and capacity. In a Party which has
no publicity procedure, the instrument establishing the NGO shall be duly
certified by a competent authority. At the time of signature or of the
deposit of the instrument of ratification, acceptance, approval or accession,
the State concerned shall inform the Secretary General of the Council
of Europe of the identity of this authority.
- 2. In order to facilitate the application
of paragraph 1, a Party may provide an optional system of publicity which
shall dispense NGOs from furnishing the proof provided for in the preceding
paragraph for each transaction that they carry out.
Article 4 
In each Party the application of this Convention may only be excluded
if the NGO invoking this Convention, by its object, its purpose or the
activity which it actually exercises:
a. contravenes national security, public safety,
or is detrimental to the prevention of disorder or crime, the protection
of health or morals, or the protection of the rights and freedoms of others;
or
b. jeopardises relations with another State
or the maintenance of international peace and security.
Article 5
- 1. This Convention shall be open for signature
by the member States of the Council of Europe which may express their
consent to be bound by:
a. signature without reservation as to ratification,
acceptance or approval, or
b. signature subject to ratification, acceptance
or approval, followed by ratification, acceptance or approval.
- 2. Instruments of ratification, acceptance
or approval shall be deposited with the Secretary General of the Council
of Europe.
Article 6
- 1. This Convention shall enter into force
on the first day of the month following the expiration of a period of
three months after the date on which three member States of the Council
of Europe have expressed their consent to be bound by the Convention in
accordance with the provisions of Article 5.
- 2. In respect of any member State which subsequently
expresses its consent to be bound by it, the Convention shall enter into
force on the first day of the month following the expiration of a period
of three months after the date of the deposit of the instrument of ratification,
acceptance or approval.
Article 7
- 1. After the entry into force of this Convention,
the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe may invite any State
not a member of the Council to accede to this Convention, by a decision
taken by the majority provided for in Article 20.d of the Statute of the
Council of Europe and by the unanimous vote of the representatives of
the Contracting States entitled to sit on the Committee.
- 2. In respect of any acceding State, the
Convention shall enter into force on the first day of the month following
the expiration of a period of three months after the date of deposit of
the instrument of accession with the Secretary General of the Council
of Europe.
Article 8
- 1. Any State may at the time of signature
or when depositing its instrument of ratification, acceptance, approval
or accession, specify the territory or territories to which this Convention
may apply.
- 2. Any State may at any later date, by a
declaration addressed to the Secretary General of the Council of Europe,
extend the application of this Convention to any other territory specified
in the declaration. In respect of such territory the Convention shall
enter into force on the first day of the month following the expiration
of a period of three months after the date of receipt of such declaration
by the Secretary General.
- 3. Any declaration made under the two preceding
paragraphs may, in respect of any territory specified in such declaration,
be withdrawn by a notification addressed to the Secretary General. The
withdrawal shall become effective on the first day of the month following
the expiration of a period of three months after the date of receipt of
such notification by the Secretary General.
Article 9
No reservation may be made to this Convention.
Article 10
- 1. Any Party may at any time denounce this
Convention by means of a notification addressed to the Secretary General
of the Council of Europe.
- 2. Such denunciation shall become effective
on the first day of the month following the expiration of a period of
three months after the date of receipt of the notification by the Secretary
General.
Article 11
The Secretary General of the Council of Europe shall notify the member
States of the Council and any State which has acceded to this Convention,
of:
a. any signature;
b. the deposit of any instrument of ratification,
acceptance, approval or accession;
c. any date of entry into force of this Convention
in accordance with Articles 6, 7 and 8;
d. any other act, notification or communication
relating to this Convention.
In witness whereof the undersigned, being duly authorised thereto, have
signed this Convention.
Done at Strasbourg, this 24th day of April 1986, in English and French,
both texts being equally authentic, in a single copy which shall be deposited
in the archives of the Council of Europe. The Secretary General of the
Council of Europe shall transmit certified copies to each member State
of the Council of Europe and to any State invited to accede to this Convention.
Explanatory Report
European Convention on the Recognition of the Legal
Personality of International Non-Governmental Organisations - Explanatory
Report - [1986] COETSER 2 (24 April 1986) (ETS No. 124)
I. The European Convention on the Recognition of the Legal Personality
of International Non-Governmental Organisations, drawn up within the Council
of Europe by a select committee of experts under the authority of the
European Committee on Legal Co-operation (CDCJ), was opened for signature
by the member States of the Council of Europe on 24 April 1986.
II. The text of the explanatory report prepared by the select committee
of experts and submitted to the Committee of Ministers of the Council
of Europe, as amended and completed by the CDCJ, does not constitute an
instrument providing an authoritative interpretation of the text of the
Convention, although it might be of such a nature as to facilitate the
understanding of the provisions contained therein.
I. Introduction
1. Since 1945 the number of international non-governmental organisations
(NGOs) has increased considerably. The variety of their aims has also
multiplied. However, NGOs, unlike associations, foundations or other private
institutions having aims and activities limited to one country, pursue
their activities in several countries, hold meetings in diverse places,
employ personnel of various nationalities, etc., because of the international
nature of their aims. All these "transnational" activities naturally
create problems, and thus the difficulties encountered by NGOs are greater
and more complicated than those faced by domestic associations, foundations
or other private institutions. Although several attempts have been made
to alleviate their difficulties at international level, there is as yet
no international instrument in force.
2. The Council of Europe recognised, as early as in 1951, the importance
of the NGOs, each in its particular field, and of their contribution to
the activities of the Organisation. It therefore adopted a resolution
providing for consultation of NGOs on matters within the competence of
the Council of Europe. This was followed by guidelines for granting consultative
status to a group of NGOs in 1954 and finally in 1972 the Committee of
Ministers of the Council of Europe adopted Resolution (72) 35 containing
new rules on the Council of Europe's relations with NGOs, irrespective
of whether they enjoy consultative status or not.
3. The Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe, being equally
aware of the absence of any international instrument in force aimed at
facilitating the activities of NGOs at international level, charged in
1981, on the proposal of the European Committee on Legal Co-operation
(CDCJ), a committee of experts with an exploratory mandate to study the
possibility of an intergovernmental action in this field at European level.
Acting on a CDCJ report based on the committee's work, the Committee of
Ministers charged a select Committee of experts on international non-governmental
organisations (CJ-R-OR) with the task of drawing up an appropriate instrument
on NGOs.
4. The CJ-R-OR held three meetings in 1982 and 1983 and submitted a draft
European convention on recognition of the legal personality of international
non-governmental organisations to the CDCJ for approval. This draft convention,
after being approved with some amendments by the CDCJ, was adopted by
the Committee of Ministers on 24 October 1985 and the Convention was opened
for signature by member States in Strasbourg on 24 April 1986.
II. Commentary on the Articles of the Convention
Article 1 (comment)
5. This article sets out to define the conditions which en international
non-governmental organisation must satisfy in order to qualify for the
advantages conferred by the Convention.
These conditions, which have to be satisfied permanently as a fundamental
requirement for continuing to benefit from the recognition provided for
in the Convention are as follows:
a. Nature of the NGO
6. The NGO must be an association, a foundation or other private institution.
In the law and practice of member States, an association means a number
of persons uniting together for some specific purpose and which, when
it has legal personality, also has separate identity to take legal action,
to acquire property, to enter into contracts, etc. A foundation is an
identified property devoted to a given purpose. The term "other private
institution" is added to cover certain institutions with legal personality
(for example, religious congregations, trade unions, mutual companies)
which in certain States have aims and structures similar to those of associations
but which are not legally considered as such.
7. The introductory sentence to Article 1 makes it a requirement that
associations, foundations and other institutions should be "private".
It follows that the Convention covers any entity which, whatever the legal
nature of the provision of domestic law whereby an NGO is created (public
law or private law in States where this distinction exists), does not
exercise prerogatives of a public authority.
b. Non-profit-making aim of international utility
8. An NGO must not have a profit-making aim. This condition distinguishes
NGOs from commercial companies or other bodies which exist to distribute
financial benefits among their members. However, an NGO may make a profit,
without altering its character, in connection with a given operation (for
example, by renting a property, selling a publication, etc.) if that operation
is to serve its non-profit-making aim. Furthermore, the aim of an NGO
must be of international utility and not simply of national or local utility,
that is, it must be of benefit to the international community. This would
therefore exclude political parties and other political organisations
whose aims and activities are centred on the domestic problems of a given
country.
9. The Convention does not define the expression "international
utility". However, the Preamble to the Convention affords a number
of useful pointers to its interpretation, since it refers to "work
of value to the international community", the requirement that it
should contribute to achieving the aims and principles of the United Nations
Charter and the Statute of the Council of Europe, and the scientific,
cultural, etc., nature of the activity. This last-mentioned element also
makes it easier to circumscribe the concept of "non-profit-making
aim".
c. Establishment by an instrument governed by internal law
10. In order to be covered by the Convention, the instrument whereby
an NGO is established must be governed by the internal law of a State.
Consequently, organisations and institutions set up by treaties or other
instruments governed by public international law are excluded. This provision
is justified by the fact that such entities are subject to public international
law and not to the domestic law of a contracting State, so that the problem
of recognition by other states does not arise.
d. Activities carried on in at least two States
11. This is the logical consequence of the international nature of the
non-profit-making aim of an NGO. The important point here is that there
is no requirement for activities to be carried on in at least two Council
of Europe member states, but simply in two different states. Therefore
NGOs established in a member state and carrying out their activities in
another State which is not a member of the Council of Europe (for example,
to fight famine in a third world country) are not excluded.
e. Statutory office in a contracting State
12. Sub-paragraph d lays down two conditions for the NGO to benefit from
the Convention: it must have its statutory office in a contracting State
and the central management and control in that State or another contracting
State. The first requirement is developed in Article 2, which is the fundamental
article of the Convention (see paragraphs 13-15 below). The second requirement
was adopted in order to protect the interests of persons concluding contracts
with an NGO by ensuring that some of its assets are located in a contracting
State.
Article 2 (comment)
13. Paragraph 1 of the article lays down the rule of recognition as of
right in all contracting States of the legal personality and capacity
acquired in one contracting State. Consequently, no special procedure
has to be followed to obtain recognition of legal personality.
The principle is that the law which governs the substance of the NGO's
legal personality and capacity is the law of the State in which the statutory
office of the NGO, as stated in the memorandum and articles of association,
is situated.
14. The fundamental criterion of the statutory office was adopted for
two main reasons. The first of these is the fact that in deciding on its
statutory office the NGO manifested a wish to be subject to a given system
of law, and that wish should be respected. The second reason is an essentially
practical one, since this principle makes it possible to avoid any break
in continuity in the legal personality of an NGO when its real seat changes
because the newly elected president or secretary general resides in another
State.
15. The principle of the statutory office does of course entail an important
change in the law of States where the rules of private international law
are based on the concept of the real seat.
Such a change is justified not only on practical grounds (to avoid situations
in which the applicable law changes too often when the administrative
seat changes) but also by the fact that the Council of Europe is a community
where respect for human rights and democratic principles constitutes the
unifying element, that is, a homogeneous legal grouping characterised
by a measure of mutual recognition as between legal systems. In addition,
the economic reasons underlying the principle of the real seat in the
case of commercial companies are less important in the case of NGOs, which
pursue non-profit-making aims.
16. The principle of the statutory office means that the NGO will have
the same legal capacity and personality in all the contracting States
as are required in the State where that office is located.
17. However, it was recognised that such a rule could not be an absolute
one. In some States, important public interests are at the root of some
restrictions or special procedures applied to, the exercise of rights
which together constitute legal capacity. For example, some States require
that authorisation be granted for the acquisition of real estate. These
restrictions, limitations or special procedures laid down by domestic
law for national entities analogous to foreign NGOs may be applicable
to the latter by virtue of paragraph 2 when they are required by essential
public interest.
It should be noted that these must be restrictions or limitations not
on the legal capacity per se but on the "exercise" of the rights
through which legal capacity manifests itself.
18. Furthermore, if a State lays down general limits applicable to all
foreigners, an NGO which has obtained legal personality in another State
will be subject to those limits.
Article 3 (comment)
19. This article deals with the question of proof of the NGO's existence
to be presented to the authorities of the State in which the NGO wishes
to be recognised. When it seeks recognition in another State an NGO is
to supply evidence that it has already been established in the State of
its statutory office and enjoys legal personality and capacity.
20. It should be noticed that the State in which the NGO wishes to be
recognised does not have to ascertain whether the legal personality has
been validly obtained in accordance with the law of the State of the statutory
office. The control should be directed only to see whether the proofs
mentioned in Article 3 have been produced.
21. Since legal requirements and procedures to establish an NGO differ
from State to State the proof to be supplied to this effect cannot be
the same in all cases. Some States require registration, publicity, or
an authorisation for the acquisition of legal personality or capacity,
while in some States just a written agreement between founder members
would suffice. In the former cases the production of registration, publicity
or administrative authorisation would be enough, but in States where a
simple agreement in writing of founder members is sufficient for the acquisition
of legal personality it is necessary that such an agreement be supplemented
by an additional act which is evidence that the agreement has in fact
been concluded at a given time. The Convention requires for this purpose
a certification by an authority which the State concerned will indicate
at the moment of the signature or ratification of the Convention. This
is intended to avoid confusion and possible refusal on the grounds of
insufficient proof and thus facilitate and expedite the recognition.
22. In order to make it easier for NGOs to function, paragraph 2 provides
for the possibility of a State establishing an appropriate form of "publicity".
The advantages of such a system to an NGO are obvious, since it will be
obliged to furnish the proof required by paragraph 1 only at the time
when the "publicity" requirement is to be satisfied. Subsequently,
it will be able simply to make use of the "publicity" as proof
of its legal personality.
However, it should be noted that this "publicity" must not
be constructive in character, that is, recognition of legal personality
must not be made subject to the production of that "publicity".
Article 4 (comment)
23. This article constitutes a guarantee clause designed to counterbalance
the effects of automatic recognition of legal personality.
It should be noted that the application of this article is independent
of the application of Article 1.
24. Article 1 (see paragraph 5 et seq. above) sets out the conditions
which have to be satisfied in order to invoke the Convention. These conditions
must be met not only at the time when the NGO is seeking recognition but
also throughout the period of that NGO's activity in a State. Failure
to satisfy any of these conditions automatically removes the right to
invoke the Convention.
On the other hand, Article 4 can apply even if the conditions of Article
1 are met.
25. It was decided not to refer generically to the "public policy"
(ordre public) of the State but, following the example of Article 11,
paragraph 2, of the European Convention on Human Rights, to specify the
grounds on which a refusal of the recognition of legal personality in
another State can be based.
26. This was done in order to avoid using the expression "public
policy" (ordre public) which can give rise to difficulties where
NGOs are concerned. In some States the concept of public policy is twofold:
the first meaning encompasses all binding national rules, while the second
concept refers only to the fundamental legal principles of the legal system
(this second concept being "public policy as defined in private international
law").
The first concept would mean that an NGO which did not satisfy any binding
provision of domestic law could not be recognised. If the second concept
were employed, recognition could only be withheld for infringement of
a fundamental principle of the legal system.
27. The concept of public policy as defined in private international
law could of course have been used in Article 4, but it is not a concept
known to the legal systems of all States. Consequently, the enumeration
based on Article 11 of the European Convention on Human Rights has been
adopted.
28. In order to complete the grounds contained in sub-paragraph a, which
are of an internal character, sub-paragraph b introduces an international
element.
It would in fact be unacceptable, in view of the ideals of peace and
democracy enshrined in the Council of Europe's Statute, for an NGO to
be accepted in a State where its activities would be legal when it is
common knowledge that the aim of that NGO is to engage, either in the
State in question or in another State, in activities which would damage
the latter. This would run counter to the development of peace and good
relations between States.
|